In the 1950s, Warren Buffett was a “cigar butt” specialist. He looked for mediocre companies selling at such low prices that he could get one “free puff” out of them usually through a liquidation or a quick mean-reversion.
He was incredibly good at it, averaging nearly 30% annually. By contrast, his later career at Berkshire Hathaway has averaged roughly 19–20%.
On paper, 30% is better than 20%. But if Buffett had never evolved into a “Quality” investor, he would likely be a footnote in financial history rather than the richest investor in the world. Here is the math behind why the “better” strategy would have produced a “worse” result.
1. The Scalability Wall (The “Big Pond” Problem)
Cigar butt investing is a “micro-cap” game. These are broken businesses, tiny manufacturers, and dying textile mills. You can easily invest $100,000 in these companies. You can probably invest $10 million.
But you cannot invest $10 billion.
The cigar butt strategy has a ceiling. If Buffett had stayed a Graham-and-Dodd purist, he would have hit a “Scalability Wall” in the late 1960s. He would have been forced to either:
- Stop accepting new capital.
- Return capital to shareholders (shrinking his compounding base).
- Accept lower returns by moving into larger, higher-quality companies.
The Lesson: A 50% return on $1 million is $500,000. A 20% return on $100 billion is $20 billion. Scale eventually matters more than percentage.
2. The Silent Killer: Tax Friction
Cigar butts are, by definition, short-term relationships. You buy the “butt,” wait for the puff, sell it, and move to the next.
This creates a massive Tax Drag.
- Cigar Butt: Every time Buffett sold a winner to find the next one, the IRS took 20–35% of the profits. He was compounding “net” dollars.
- Quality (Buy & Hold): By buying See’s Candies or Coca-Cola and never selling, Buffett turned the IRS into an interest-free loan provider. The billions in “unrealized capital gains” stayed in his account, compounding for him for decades.
3. The Power of “Float” (The Leverage Factor)
The “Cigar Butt” approach is a predatory or extractive style of investing. You are looking for assets to strip or dividends to bleed.
The “Quality” approach allowed Buffett to build Berkshire Hathaway, an insurance-based conglomerate. This gave him access to “Float” money paid by insurance policyholders that Berkshire gets to hold and invest before claims are paid.
- The Cigar Butt Buffett only invested his own money.
- The Berkshire Buffett invested his money plus billions of dollars of other people’s money for free.
Without the shift to quality, he never would have acquired National Indemnity or GEICO, and he would have lost the “engine” that provided the fuel for his largest bets.
4. The Mental Exhaustion of “The Hunt”
Cigar butt investing is high-maintenance. You are constantly digging through the trash to find a diamond. You have to find a new idea every 6 to 18 months because your old ideas keep reaching “fair value” and must be sold.
By switching to “Wonderful Companies,” Buffett only had to be right a few times a decade. As Charlie Munger famously said, “The big money is not in the buying and the selling, but in the waiting.”
Conclusion: The Math of Greatness
If Buffett had stayed a cigar-butt investor, he might still be the greatest “percentage” investor of all time, perhaps compounding a small fund at 40% a year. He would be a very wealthy man perhaps worth $1 billion or $2 billion.
But he wouldn’t be Warren Buffett.
He became a centibillionaire precisely because he was willing to accept a lower annual percentage in exchange for a strategy that was infinitely scalable, tax-efficient, and structurally leveraged.
The Value Investor’s Takeaway: Don’t just look for the highest return. Look for the return that you can sustain at the highest scale for the longest period of time.
BargaInvest Capital 
Leave a comment